Examples of infringement of intellectual property rights in daily life are:

1. A case of a tourist goods store selling counterfeit products for the protection of geographical indications.

when the market supervision bureau inspected a tourist goods store in the development zone, it was found that the packaging of its products was marked with the series of "commemorative wine to resist US aggression and aid Korea".

after investigation, in order to open up the market and attract foreign tourists to visit Dandong to buy special goods, the parties cooperated with a liquor company in Jiangsu to print the pattern of "products protected by geographical indications of the People's Republic of China" in a prominent position on the outer packaging and packaging boxes of the products they sold, without obtaining the certification of geographical indications to resist US aggression and aid Korea.

this behavior violates the provisions of article 21 of the regulations on the protection of geographical indication products and the relevant provisions of the product quality law of the people's Republic of China.

2. A winery sells counterfeit Wuliangye and other registered trademark wines

During the inspection, law enforcement officers of the Municipal Market Supervision Bureau found that a winery in Dandong sells infringing and counterfeit wines, including Wuliangye, Shede Liquor, Haizhilan, Jiannanchun, Penfolds, Remy Martin VSOP, Martell Blue Ribbon and other domestic and imported wines.

Law enforcement officers found rubber water and towel rags in the basement of the client, which were used to smear the original production date of cans of beer, and another set of code spraying equipment was used to spray the production date of cans of beer.

the party concerned violates the provisions of Article 57 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China and other laws and regulations. The party concerned shall be fined 1, yuan for infringing upon the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of others, and other illegal acts shall be given administrative punishment.

3. A stationery distribution center in Kuandian County sells counterfeit registered trademark goods.

In March, 221, Kuandian County Market Supervision Bureau received a complaint, which reflected that a stationery distribution center in Kuandian County sold "Nanfu" brand batteries that infringed its registered trademark. Law enforcement officers found that Nanfu batteries sold in its store and stored in the warehouse were identified as infringing goods by the trademark owner and issued an Appraisal Certificate.

the above actions of the parties violate the provisions of article 57 of the trademark law of the people's Republic of China. Kuandian County Market Supervision Bureau imposed penalties on it: 1. Confiscating 29 infringing "Nanfu" brand batteries; 2. A fine of 4, yuan.

4. A supercharger co., Ltd. in Fengcheng infringed on the exclusive right to use a registered trademark of others.

in August, 221, law enforcement officers of Fengcheng Market Supervision Bureau found supercharger, supercharger core, supercharger volute, supercharger intermediate and supercharger empty packing box marked with "Garrett", "HOLSET" and "honeywell" in the production workshop of a supercharger company in Fengcheng.

the parties concerned are unable to provide the brand authorization letter of the registered trademark of the above-mentioned products, the agreement between the assignor and the assignee and the license contract, and cannot provide the legal source and provider of the infringing goods.

it was found that the party concerned began to engage in supercharger assembly and production activities without a license in the winter of 214, and registered a supercharger company in Fengcheng in January 221, and started production and operation in May 221.

the behavior of the party concerned violated the provisions of Article 57 of the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China, and the case was transferred to the public security organ for further investigation and trial because it was suspected of committing a crime.

5. A company v. a technology contract dispute case.

On September 8th, 217, Plaintiff A (Party A) and Defendant B (Company B) signed the Board Game Development Contract. The contract stipulates the rights and obligations of both parties.

after the delivery of the mahjong game beta, the two parties have been communicating and modifying issues such as mahjong Hu cards not being displayed, score calculation errors, rules of the game, hosting, etc. until December 12, 217.

After that, the plaintiff informed the defendant to terminate the contract for the development of chess and cards involved in the case. Both parties failed to reach an agreement on the termination of the contract, so they brought a lawsuit to the court.

after the trial, the people's court ruled that the defendant should pay the plaintiff's deposit and other money according to Articles 6, 94, 4 and 97 of the Contract Law of the People's Republic of China and Article 64 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China, and rejected the defendant's counterclaim.