The review of judicial examination is a long process, which is determined by its characteristics of large amount of information, numerous disciplines and meticulous examination. Generally speaking, it takes about five to six months to review. For on-the-job candidates, it takes longer, because on-the-job candidates mainly review every night, weekend and holiday, so it is best for friends who take the on-the-job exam to review from 10 or1month to September of the following year, so as to be comfortable.

Two-stage test

Law is a humanities discipline that emphasizes memory and familiarity. Although the law ultimately examines people's logical thinking ability, memory is actually the basis of logical application, and memory requires a lot of time investment. In this regard, from the perspective of memory law, repeated memory is the only way to effectively and firmly remember, especially for candidates with poor memory ability. Therefore, it is necessary to repeat many rounds and remember scientifically.

① Systematic intensive reading stage

At this stage, we should read through the judicial examination counseling books or handouts published by training institutions, fully familiarize ourselves with the knowledge points and relevant laws and regulations required by the judicial examination, establish a knowledge system, and master the basic principles. To achieve comprehensive coverage of knowledge, it is necessary to read intensively, but it does not require a deep understanding and mastery of knowledge. At the same time, combined with the real questions, which department method to review will do the real questions accordingly, as a way to test your review. Look at the methods of single subject and department as a whole, analyze what problems are raised at a certain point, and from what angle, and carefully try to figure out the ideas of the proposer.

② Special review stage

At this stage, we should be guided by the outline of the judicial examination and the real questions over the years, narrow the scope of review, concentrate our time and energy on common test sites and important and difficult points, integrate relevant knowledge, form a context, and form a knowledge block, that is, a special topic, on the basis of the knowledge in the first stage. At the same time, we should have a certain depth in the study of important knowledge points and analyze the angles that are not observed in the real questions. We should also test our review effect in time and consolidate our knowledge by practicing some exercises with high quality.

③ leak detection and filling stage

With the progress of review, most of the knowledge is basically mastered, but it is inevitable that there are relatively weak contents. At this time, it is particularly important to break through the knowledge points that have not been mastered or have not been mastered enough. Through the review at this stage, a single knowledge point is strengthened and consolidated, and the basic principles are repeatedly used to analyze cases, so as to achieve a thorough grasp and make up for their own shortcomings. It is worth reminding candidates that at this stage, we should strengthen the practice of answering questions, discussing and analyzing test papers, and complete reading, reviewing questions and answering questions within the specified time, instead of just watching and not doing it. Only by making full preparations before the exam can we be handy in the exam.

④ Sprint stage

Choose a complete set of real or simulated questions and complete the answer within the time required by the formal judicial examination. By simulating the exam, we can experience the feeling and speed of the exam, accumulate on-the-spot experience and exercise the ability to take the exam. At this stage, in the review of knowledge, we should focus on the key points marked by ourselves and the hot spots predicted in the previous review, review subjects with strong memory, such as the constitution and legal history in test paper 1, adjust our work and rest and mentality, and take the test calmly.

Third, problems that should be paid attention to in the review

1. Quickly grasp the key points of the exam. According to relevant statistics, the repetition rate of knowledge points in judicial examination reaches 80% every year. If we summarize the knowledge points in the real questions, we can quickly grasp the key points of the exam and master this part of the content, and the success of the judicial examination will be guaranteed. However, many candidates are prone to fall into misunderstanding and often spend a lot of time reviewing knowledge that only accounts for 20% of the score. This is the "28 Law" in the judicial examination.

2. Cultivate correct problem-solving ideas. There are many candidates who have learned the basic knowledge well, but their exam results are disappointing because they have not mastered the correct method of solving problems. This requires everyone to carefully compare the answers and comments when reviewing the questions, and clarify the thinking of solving problems. The importance of clear problem-solving ideas in exams cannot be overemphasized. It can help you overcome the confusion of answering questions and choose the correct answer "steadily, accurately and resolutely".

3. Exercise effective review and memory methods. Review and memory methods directly affect test scores, but many people don't work hard in this respect. For example, they just take some review materials in general, don't pick the key points, don't do the questions, and even if they do the questions, they just skim them in their minds but don't do them. Experience shows that copying what you want to remember once can achieve the effect that you can't achieve by reading it several times, while designing relevant knowledge into test questions and memorizing it by doing the questions is better than copying, and the memory is more profound.

Fourth, find a review method that suits you.

There is no unified conclusion on review methods, and the one that suits you is the best. Therefore, everyone should find the most suitable review method according to their actual situation. But good review methods have their similarities, and candidates can refer to them.

For example, to review criminal law, you can read the textbooks quickly, find out the key difficulties and your own weaknesses, understand the basic knowledge structure and system of criminal law, and have an overall grasp of criminal law. Then read the textbook carefully from the beginning, spend more time on those key and difficult points and your own weaknesses, and thoroughly understand the basic concepts and principles. While reading the textbook, we should carefully do the real questions related to this chapter in the criminal law part of the previous real questions, and then make a comparative analysis. If you do it right, you must understand why it is right, see if the analysis is consistent with your own ideas, and if it is not, try to rely on your own ideas in the analysis; If you do something wrong, you should read the analysis carefully, understand why you chose this instead of that, find the legal or legal basis, and then think about what you thought when you did the problem, and what is the difference between you and analysis. Finally, you should rely on your own ideas to do the problem. After reading the chapters and related real questions, after listening to the lecture, go back to sort out the main knowledge points in this chapter and summarize the common test sites and difficulties. Similarly, reviewing other subjects according to this idea, although speaking slowly, is very effective.

Five departments test confidence and emotion

Everyone must establish confidence when reviewing at the beginning. In the process of reviewing, especially when doing problems, it is inevitable that mood swings will occur. At this time, please be sure to adjust your mentality. Only by persistence can we win the final victory.