Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark registration - Which one is better, Pathfinder or Mu Gaodi? What are the advantages?
Which one is better, Pathfinder or Mu Gaodi? What are the advantages?

Earn 2 points for the first answer. Pathfinder is garbage with inferior quality and high price! Comparative analysis of three common tent brands: UXE, Mugaodi and Snow Wolf. Each of these three brands has one of its most famous products, LUXE’s Spider 2, Mugaodi’s Cold Mountain 2AIR, and Snow Wolf’s Everest Hiking Camp. They respectively represent the positioning of these three brands. LUXE is a high-end product, Mugaodi is a mid-to-high-end product, and Snow Wolf is in a mid-to-low-end price range. It should be said that these three brands have gained reputation in their respective areas of strength. Let’s take a look at the characteristics of their products first: the three models are all traditional yurt-style two-pole cross structures, which are the most classic and practical. LUXE has the highest price and all the dressings are unambiguous. A large amount of nylon is used. Nylon fabrics are relatively lighter, softer and colorful. But it is expensive and is generally used in high-end tents and clothing. In addition, Spider uses Korean YUNNAN aluminum rods, which increase the cost of the product. All webbings are also made of nylon webbing, all of which are the choice of high-end products. The design style of Spider 2 is to pursue lightness, so the size is also the smallest. The Lengshan size is 140, which is the largest among the three. It has a large area of ??mesh for better ventilation and a beautiful round door shape. The outer tent is made of plaid polyester fabric, which is tear-resistant. The base fabric is a thick enough 150D Oxford cloth, which is wear-resistant but relatively thick. The workmanship is good, but the through-type construction is more troublesome. Lengshan is a mediocre and mediocre design. The design of the hiking camp is the traditional style of Snow Wolf at first glance, and the price is killer. The price of the aluminum pole tent has been brought to the lowest. I remember that the original retail price was only 298. This year it seems to have been improved and the price has also increased, but it is still low. Looking at the quality, the size is 135, which is a very reasonable size. The base fabric of the tent is not waterproof. It has double doors, reflective drawstrings, thick webbing, and high-strength aviation aluminum. It is the same as Lengshan (domestic aluminum poles are all produced in the same factory). ), it has everything it needs, and the workmanship is indeed improved a lot compared to the old 298 model. I don’t know how to control the cost so well. After comparing the quality of the three tents, we can see the design ideas. LUXE pursues quality regardless of cost. The things are beautifully made, and even the packaging boxes are exquisite. But the price is really the biggest trouble. It cannot occupy a larger market. It is praised but not sold. It has rave reviews online but not many actual sales. Mugaodi uses the best possible surface dressings and uses factory advantages to make its products as excellent as possible. It not only attracts the attention of mid-to-high-end customers, but also attracts some low-end customers to bleed blood, occupying the largest share of the market. Without the emergence of Snow Wolf Hiking Camp, Mugaodi’s Cold Mountain would have been unbeatable in the aluminum pole tent market. Everest trekking camp, don’t pack anything important, and save everything you can. Take a closer look. Both LUXE and Lengshan are large-area mesh. They are typical three-season tents. There is an inner door inside the hiking camp screen door, which increases warmth to a certain extent and can also be used as a four-season tent. The lowest price allows customers to More could be used. Just like his clothing style, the price is the best. Recently, three tents have come out with a tent that imitates the HUBBA shape of MSR. LUXE’s is the Sojourner, Mugaodi’s is the Ruyi, and Snow Wolf’s is the Xiangyun. They are almost the same style, which explains the problem better. The Sojourner and Ruyi are priced the same. Almost the same, both in the early 1000s. The Sojourner’s advantage is that it uses South Korea’s YUNNAN aluminum pole. Ruyi’s advantage is that it uses CORDURAPU fabric, which is coated with silicon and is more wear-resistant. The overall cost is higher than the Sojourner after excluding the aluminum pole. But the retail price is cheaper than Sojourner. LUXE is a place where you can clearly see that no expense is spared. Mugaodi uses the cost in the most practical place. Snow Wolf's Xiangyun is more interesting and looks the same. It doesn't use Korean aluminum poles or CORDURAPU. The fabric is made of more practical plaid polyester fabric, and the price is only half of the former two. He just found a way out again, and the price-performance ratio is a mess. The current market situation is also consistent with the design ideas of these three brands. Mugaodi's rich and diverse styles and various price points have attracted most attention. By expanding channels, her shadow can be seen in almost any outdoor store. The ubiquitous channels have enabled her to occupy the top position in the domestic tent market.

Snow Wolf attracts more consumers with entry-level and general camping needs at mid-to-low prices. Almost all early products are like this. The recently launched Xiangyun has the shadow of mid-to-high-end tents. I don’t know if this is a signal that tents should also look like Clothing is also made to make more people affordable, but this is a problem that all outdoor products must face if they want to grow bigger. I hope Snow Wolf can continue to maintain such development. LUXE attracts players who like to study equipment very much, but the share is not large. If it can abandon some flashy things and be closer to consumers, can more praise be converted into sales? There are many other brands, such as ACME, Poorland, etc., but their overall influence is not as good as the above three.