At present, the court has made a judgment and stated that the latter needs to pay Wu Jing 610,000 yuan in compensation.

This matter is actually related to personal intellectual property rights and nominal rights, because many people still have no awareness of personal intellectual property rights, and some people will even intentionally infringe upon clear enforcement. other people’s personal intellectual property rights. Such behavior has seriously affected the intellectual property rights of others and also dampened the enthusiasm of original creators.

1. What is going on?

Wu Jing previously made a movie called Wolf Warriors. Technically speaking, Wolf Warriors is a series. It is precisely because the movie Wolf Warriors is very good-looking and has a certain audience base. Some unscrupulous companies have even applied for Wolf Warrior as their own trademark, seeking illegal benefits in this way. There is a company that directly named Wolf Warrior after himself. After Wu Jing learned about it, he took the company to court. The court has already made a ruling.

2. The court ruled that the other party needs to pay compensation to Wu Jing.

Wu Jing launched lawsuits against four companies this time because these three companies simultaneously infringed on Wu Jing’s intellectual property rights and production safety. One company directly changed its name to Wolf Warrior, and several other companies abused Wu Jing's image rights without Wu Jing's knowledge, and had a certain impact on Wu Jing's personal reputation. It is for this reason that the court ordered the following companies to pay compensation of 300,000 to 610,000 yuan to Wu Xing.

3. Personal intellectual property rights need to be protected.

In today's increasingly developed Internet age, there are countless cases of personal intellectual property rights and personal portrait rights being infringed. Many people are becoming more aware of their rights protection, so this kind of rights protection information often appears. I personally strongly support this kind of behavior. I think it is extremely excessive to abuse other people's portrait rights and intellectual property rights without their authorization. Such behavior not only infringes on the rights of others, but also desecrates personal intellectual property rights.