Some people think that an exclusive license cannot be sublicensed. The reason is that under an exclusive license, only the licensee can use the trademark, and neither the licensor nor a third party is allowed to use it. If the exclusive license is sublicensed, a third party will be allowed to use the trademark. Conflict with exclusive license. This is a failure to properly understand what an exclusive license means.

When considering this issue, you should consider ordinary licenses, exclusive licenses, and exclusive licenses together. If you look at these three licensing methods one by one, you will find that the rights of the licensor are being compressed step by step, and the rights of the licensor are being compressed step by step. The rights of the licensor have not changed, so the word "exclusive" in the so-called exclusive license restricts the licensor and does not allow the licensor to directly authorize a third party to use the trademark, but it does not prohibit the licensee from using the trademark without the authorization of the licensor. License the third party to use the trademark, so the licensee of the exclusive license can sub-license the use of the trademark to a third party with the authorization of the licensor.