Shuren Company believes that the categories of goods and services of the trademarks used by ofo Company are the same as those approved and registered by the plaintiff.

Shuren Company believes that through a series of use, publicity and promotion activities, ofo Company has made the relevant public think that "Little Yellow Car" refers to ofo Company. When Shuren Company uses its legally registered trademark "Little Yellow Car" in its goods and services, it will make the relevant public have a special connection with the goods and services provided by Shuren Company and ofo Company, or cause misunderstanding, which will split the connection between "Little Yellow Car" and Shuren Company and lose the basic recognition function of "Little Yellow Car" as its registered trademark.

Shuren Company believes that the behavior of ofo Company constitutes an infringement of Shuren Company's exclusive right to use a registered trademark, so it sued ofo Company to the court. Request the court to determine that ofo infringes on the exclusive right to use its registered trademark, and judge ofo to immediately stop the infringement and stop using the "Little Yellow Car" trademark; The judgment ofo published a statement on relevant media and websites to eliminate the impact and compensate the economic loss of 3 million yuan and related reasonable expenses.

On November 8th, at two o'clock in the afternoon, Haidian formed a collegiate bench to hear the case. Chen Changyi, the president of Zhongguancun Court, was the presiding judge, and the former defendant's agent of Haidian Court attended the trial.