We must start from the judicial level, reflect on and improve concepts and systems, and promote "same verdict in the same case" as much as possible to achieve fair trials and ensure judicial fairness. Formulate detailed rules for the application of laws and regulate judges’ discretion. It is necessary to further realize the advancement and detail of legislation, expand the coverage of the law, and reduce the proportion of judges' discretion. Legal control over the abuse of judges’ discretion should be achieved through detailed substantive legal norms as much as possible. On the premise of complying with existing legal provisions, various specific applicable rules should be formulated according to different situations to regulate the abuse of judges' discretion. The Supreme People's Court should promptly formulate judicial interpretations on issues with unclear legal provisions to fill relevant legal loopholes; the people's courts at higher levels should formulate normative opinions on the application of the law as much as possible, refine relevant regulations, and unify judicial standards.

Intensify the supervision of internal case quality in courts. It is necessary to further strengthen the functional role of the judicial committee in studying cases, improve and standardize the operation of the collegial panel, brainstorm ideas, expand the democracy of the judicial decision-making process, and ensure the quality of cases; at the same time, it is necessary to establish a coordination mechanism for the application of the law. It is necessary to establish a coordination mechanism for legal opinions, legal understanding and legal application between courts at higher and lower levels, between various judicial institutions of the same court, and between judicial organizations, establish and implement a joint meeting system for relevant professional trials, and give full play to the joint meeting of chief judges, and solve difficult problems. The role of case study and other systems is to regularly hold discussions on the application of law in series of cases, difficult cases and new types of cases to unify legal viewpoints and unified adjudication standards. In addition, it is necessary to further standardize the exercise of judicial power, reasonably break down the various aspects of the exercise of judicial power, and pay attention to the separation of powers and checks and balances.

Establish a professional collegial panel to conduct typed trials of cases. Under my country's existing judicial system, a professional collegiate panel should be established, a professional trial model should be implemented, trial and adjudication of case types should be carried out, and the homogeneity of adjudication of similar cases should be pursued to meet the requirement of "similar cases are handled similarly", and then "same cases should be handled similarly". Same referee” goal.

Strengthen the business guidance of superior courts and standardize judgment standards. The superior court shall, in accordance with the provisions of the "Several Opinions of the Supreme People's Court on Regulating the Trial Business Relationship between Superior and Lower People's Courts", by hearing cases, formulating judicial interpretations or normative documents or trial business documents, issuing guiding or reference cases, and convening trials. Provide guidance on the trial work of lower courts and standardize and unify adjudication standards in the form of business meetings, organizing judge training, and summarizing trial experience.

Construct a case guidance system to avoid "different verdicts in the same case". Redrink pointed out: "Each precedent has some guiding force for future cases of the same or similar nature." The purpose of implementing the case guidance system in our country is to draw lessons from the existing statutory legal system. Things that are beneficial to us in the case law system can make up for the shortcomings of statutory norms and avoid "different judgments in the same case". Therefore, it is necessary to follow the "Regulations of the Supreme People's Court on Case Guidance Work", give full play to the demonstration and guidance role of typical cases, unify judicial standards and adjudication standards, and ensure "the same verdict for the same case."

The above are relevant discussions for reference only. I hope it will be helpful to you