Some time ago, Lala finally registered successfully? Cargo lesbian? Category 39 Freight Related Service Trademarks. The two parties involved in the trademark dispute in this case include Shijiazhuang Niwo Composite Trading Co., Ltd. and Quan Min Express Co., Ltd.

so what have you experienced during this period?

this battle for trademark rights can be traced back to 215. Founded in 213, the company entered the mainland market in 214 and submitted? Horara? The application for registration of Class 42 scientific and technological trademarks was successfully registered in 215. On January 3rd, 215, Cargo Lala Company received the first round of financing of USD 1 million, and one day later, Nivo Company submitted it to the Trademark Office? Cargo lesbian? Trademark registration application in 39 kinds of freight and other services. On March 22nd of the following year, Nivo Company submitted it again? Cargo lesbian? Trademark registration application in 39 kinds of freight and other services.

On April 14th, 216, Cargo Lala Company submitted to the Trademark Office? Cargo lesbian? The application for trademark registration in 39 kinds of freight services was rejected. ? The trademark has been squatted by others. Want to get it? Pull the goods? For a trademark, a request for invalidation of the disputed trademark must first be submitted to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the former State Administration for Industry and Commerce. ?

in this way, truck drivers started a trademark fight? Fight? . To prove it? Cargo lesbian? This trademark had a certain influence on Cargo Lala Company before it was preempted. Cargo Lala Company conducted three rounds of extensive evidence collection within the company. According to an old employee of the company, in the process of collecting evidence, she and her colleagues found report materials, promotional pictures, screenshots of order data, brand authorization, etc., and there were more than 3, pages of evidence alone.

in recent years, many? A sky-high trademark? The case of. According to media reports, the dispute between Apple and Proview Technology Co., Ltd. over the iPad trademark ended with Apple paying Proview Technology 6 million dollars, and Proview Technology transferred the iPad trademark to Apple.

well, that's all I want to share in this issue.