Recently, Fund Manager launched a list of mid- to long-term funds in the past three and five years, which has attracted more attention.

For fund investors, when buying a fund, it is necessary to penetrate into the fund manager behind each fund to make a choice, because it is easy to be misled simply by looking at fund performance, because the fund managers of some funds change a lot, and the existing fund managers

He may not be a major contributor to performance or he may not have been in office for a long time.

Therefore, from the perspective of actual fund selection, Fund Manager today specially launched a list of fund managers, selecting those fund managers who have continuously managed funds for three or five years as the objects of investigation to see which fund managers can stand out in the mid- to long-term.

1. Equity fund managers with leading performance (in the past three, four and five years) 1. Statistics of equity fund managers with leading performance in the three-year period (October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2019) show that in

Fund managers who have been continuously managing a single fund for three years were included in the investigation. There are 32 equity fund managers whose performance in managing active equity funds in the past three years exceeded 50%. Most of them have good drawdown control and have obvious excess returns relative to their respective performance benchmarks. Overall,

At the leading level in the industry.

Among them, Xiao Nan from E Fund, Liu Yanchun from Invesco Great Wall Fund, and Zhang Kun from E Fund ranked among the top three.

2. Statistics of equity fund managers with leading performance in the four-year period (October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2019) show that there are 22 equity fund managers who have continuously managed a single fund for four years as the inspection objects.

The performance of managed active equity funds in the past three years has exceeded 73%, and most drawdowns have been well controlled. The excess returns relative to their respective performance benchmarks are significant, and overall they are at the leading level in the industry.

Among them, Xiao Nan from E Fund, Zhang Kun from E Fund, and Liu Yanchun from Invesco Great Wall Fund ranked among the top three.

The latest list of the best fund managers in China for three, four and five years is here! 3. Statistics of the leading equity fund managers in the five-year period (October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019) show that based on continuous management orders,

Only fund managers whose funds have been in operation for more than five years were included in the investigation. There were 22 equity fund managers whose performance in managing active equity funds in the past three years exceeded 110%. Most of them had good drawdown control and had significant excess returns relative to their respective performance benchmarks. Overall, they were ahead of their peers.

level.

Among them, Zhang Kun from E Fund, Lin Peng from Orient Securities Asset Management, and Xiao Nan from E Fund ranked the top three.

The latest list of the best fund managers in China in three, four and five years is here! 2. Pure debt and secondary debt fund managers with leading performance (in the past five years) 1. Pure debt fund managers with leading performance in five years (

Statistics from October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019 show that based on fund managers who have continuously managed a single fund for five years, 16 pure debt fund managers have managed the performance of pure debt funds in the past five years.

More than 38%, a significant excess return compared to their respective performance benchmarks.

Among them, the Wang Xiaochen/Zhang Yajun combination from E Fund, Yin Peijun from Quam Fund, and Wang Li from Dacheng Fund ranked among the top three.

The latest list of the best fund managers in China for three, four and five years is here! 2. Statistics of secondary debt fund managers with leading performance in the five-year period (October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2019) show that

Fund managers who have continuously managed a single fund for five years were included in the investigation. There are 15 secondary debt fund managers whose performance in managing secondary debt funds in the past five years exceeded 42%, with significant excess returns relative to their respective performance benchmarks.

Among them, Guo Jun from Boshi Fund, Zhang Qinghua from E Fund, and Zhang Qian from GF Fund ranked among the top three.

Here is the list of the latest and best fund managers in China for three, four and five years! During this National Day holiday, as a professional asset management media, Fund Jun has specially invited well-known domestic public fund managers, private equity investment managers and brokerage investment hosts.

I personally wrote an article to summarize the stock market and bond market conditions in the first three quarters, analyze future capital market opportunities and investment layout, and provide a reference for everyone's investment layout after the holiday.

Today *** there are nine public fund managers writing articles. What do they think of the market in the fourth quarter? Please take a look~~ Harvest Return Fund Manager Chang Zhen: Four dimensions to screen high-quality companies and focus on three major investment directions. As the market in September comes to an end,

A-shares are still reeling amid continued volatility, and some high-quality active equity funds have created generous excess returns for investors.

In the GARP investment strategy group of Harvest Fund, the main investment goal is to find stocks that are undervalued by the market and have strong potential for sustained and stable growth.

We believe that buying high-quality companies at reasonable prices and holding them for a long time is an effective way to continuously obtain excess returns. The main goal is that the company must be of high quality. When selecting stocks, the main focus is on the quality of the company, starting from the company's fundamentals, and making money from the company.

For growth money, focus on choosing companies with relatively deep moats that can continue to bring high returns and demonstrate relatively high ROE.

Generally speaking, the selection criteria for good companies are mainly based on comprehensive considerations in four aspects.