1. Controlling enterprises means controlling political power. Only by electing the director of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission and letting the people control enterprises can the political power belong to the people. Big capitalists own companies and have money. Big capitalists control the media by running media and placing advertisements. Ordinary people have no money to run media. Big capitalists

It controls the freedom of speech of the media; elections rely on the media to recommend candidates, and big capitalists control the media to recommend candidates they agree with, so big capitalists control elections; big capitalists have money to hire many good lawyers, but ordinary people have neither money nor time to hire good lawyers.

Litigation, so the big capitalists control the judiciary; most people work for the big capitalists and their jobs are controlled by them, so the big capitalists control the workers; the Ford Foundation in the United States has trained many scholars, called "think tanks", and these think tanks are funded by the capitalists to influence the scholars.

Used for daily decision-making by administrative officials.

The big capitalists control the media, elections, judiciary, and workers, and use think tanks to influence administration. Therefore, the big bourgeoisie are the real political holders of capitalist countries, and the president is a puppet, and their power is inherited through corporate descendants.

The reason why big capitalists can control political power is because they own enterprises. Therefore, when they control enterprises, they control political power.

Some people may argue that being an official is the best way to gain power. How can you gain power by controlling an enterprise? I would like to ask, if controlling an enterprise is not controlling the political power, why do official officials and big capitalists try so hard to privatize enterprises to themselves? If you think it is best to be an official, can you

Bureaucrats and big capitalists cannot give their family businesses to the people of the country. The people promise that they will become officials, but they cannot manage the economy as officials. Can they agree? Isn't it important to be an official? Why are they unwilling to hand over their companies to become officials? Our country

It is known that the political reform or constitutional government that the powerful are very enthusiastic about is to control the political power by a few people: because the national enterprises embezzled by the powerful through reform are not in conformity with the constitution, the constitution must be overturned under the banner of democracy without the consent of the majority to make the embezzled wealth legal; public knowledge falsely opposes it

The faction supports official reforms, criticizes the red brand, falsely claims that the current problems are caused by the red brand, and then ostensibly holds elections, while the insiders pretend to be forced to agree, and then secretly replace the constitution without majority consent (their key problem is that they

The constitution has not been subject to a majority referendum, and their constitution protects their illegal wealth. Therefore, asking for a referendum on whether the constitution should be divided into public ownership or private ownership of enterprises is tantamount to democracy for their wealth, and they are in a dilemma).

Let's see, after they changed the constitution into a private ownership constitution, their businesses were legal, and then they controlled the business and then controlled the political power. If you elect a president, you can't harm their businesses at all, and they can't let you raise wages. Isn't this fake democracy?

Through the above analysis, everyone can see that as long as a small number of big bourgeoisie control enterprises, then the majority of people who work for them will be controlled and their jobs will be controlled. They will control administration and justice by controlling enterprises. It is impossible for the people to hold power and democracy. Therefore, it must

Only through economic democracy in enterprises can the majority of people control enterprises and achieve the goal of people taking power.

If the big bourgeoisie takes control of enterprises, the people will not be able to take power no matter how they are elected. Therefore, we must promote economic democracy and elect the director of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (as it is called now. I think it should be called the People's Committee on Enterprises). Only then can the people control enterprises and completely

Overthrow their conspiracy to privatize and rob state-owned enterprises (the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission was originally hired by the people to manage enterprises. If he cannot be elected, it will inevitably cause him to harm the people's enterprises).

Elect the directors of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission at all levels, and then the people control them, and the people control the enterprises, and thwart their plots (our elites do not allow democratic supervision, and must overturn the current constitution and party constitution after the privatization of state-owned enterprises to require democratic supervision. This is

Why? Because: Under the Party Constitution and Constitution of the Communist Party, state-owned enterprises belong to the people of the whole country. If democratic supervision is carried out, democratic supervision of state-owned enterprises will inevitably be carried out. Then they cannot embezzle state-owned enterprises. Only if there is no democratic supervision now, they can

embezzling state-owned enterprises; and after they have embezzled state-owned enterprises, they must overturn the party constitution and the constitution in the name of democracy (if they do not overturn the party constitution and the constitution, their enterprises will be illegal and may be liquidated). At this time, their embezzlement of state-owned enterprises has basically been completed.

You can no longer harm their enterprises through democratic supervision. In short, it is very important to protect state-owned enterprises and carry out democratic supervision of state-owned enterprises.) After the election of the director of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, it is obvious that issues such as the distribution of state-owned enterprises at all levels are under the control of the people.

It is different from their privatized sweatshops, and the evils of privatization can be clearly seen; their election is just to elect a puppet, which has no practical significance. Our election of the director of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission can affect various economic incomes, so that he can

Expanding the scale of high-welfare state-owned enterprises can obviously defeat their anti-people electoral puppet campaign.

The legal basis for electing the director of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission is the Constitution: Today's state-owned enterprises belong to the people of the country. Their privatization of state-owned enterprises without the consent of the owners is all illegal. We ordinary people have the right to manage state-owned enterprises in accordance with the Constitution.

If they force the privatization of state-owned enterprises such as railways, the people, as the owners of state-owned enterprises, have the right to elect a state-owned enterprise management committee. This elected management committee can declare that their privatized state-owned enterprises are illegal transactions and remove the current state-owned enterprises on behalf of the people.

Manager, take over the current state-owned enterprise.

The election of this state-owned enterprise management committee is based on the current red constitution.