Criteria for measuring successful composition 1: Money is not the only criterion.
When wealth only represents money, can it really measure a person's success? I don't agree, because I always think that money is a sign to measure a person's success, but it is by no means the only sign, and it is more about a person's self-worth.
Different people have different goals for themselves, so their signs of success are different. When a person sets his goal as an entrepreneur, money is a sign of his success; When a person sets his goal as a teacher, it is a sign of his success that peaches and plums are all over the world; When a person sets his goal as a doctor, the recovery of the injured is a sign of his success and so on.
Just like Yu Zhou in Winning in China, his goal is to win venture capital. Finally, he got the venture capital with his own efforts and talent. Well, I think money is a sign of his success. Of course, the money is also obtained on the basis of perseverance, perseverance and courage to show your sword. It can be said that the money won is the product of these spirits, so if these spirits are the process of his success, then the money won is the symbol of his success.
But like Lei Feng, his goal in life is to serve the people. When he did, he succeeded. I think for Lei Feng, serving the people can be regarded as a sign of his success. Although he didn't have much money, he lived out his self-worth, helped the broad masses of the people, made contributions to society, and was imitated by future generations.
So I think different people have different goals and pursuits, and everyone thinks that the sign of success is different, but as long as they reach their psychological goals, they are successful.
In today's society, too many people think that only money is a sign to measure a person's success. As for many people, they have racked their brains to have this, thus embarking on the road of crime, and finally failed to find their true life value. Therefore, we should all look down on money, as long as it is moderate, but we should pay more attention to our life goals and the meaning of living, so as to work hard, and don't just think that money is the symbol of success.
So my opinion is that money is a sign to measure a person's success, but it is definitely not just money. When we look at this problem comprehensively, we should try our best to find our true temperament and interest and realize our self-worth.
Criteria for measuring success Composition 2: Criteria for success
20 1 1 On April 4th, Beijing Normal University professor Dong Fan wrote in Weibo. Don't come to me when you are 40 years old and don't have 40 million net worth, let alone be my student. ? Coincidentally, a professor at China University of Science and Technology holds a similar view: students who graduate from business schools will not make money, so business schools will go for nothing. These remarks not only caused great controversy, but also caused us to think: is money the only criterion to measure success?
The answer is of course no. From Tencent founder Ma to the world's richest man Bill? Gates, from famous scholars Yu Dan and Yi Zhongtian to IT legend Jobs, as long as we pay a little attention, we will find that each of them has a different road to success, but one thing is certain: they don't take money as the ultimate goal of success. America? Warren. Buffett once said: Money is an accessory to success. ? Therefore, the measure of success should not be money, but should focus on more meaningful things.
In ancient times, many wise men were able to succeed even if they were in rags: Li Bai's upright character made him? Oh, how can I bow and scrape to those people with high status and important positions? They never want to be seen with a sincere face. Sighed and left the officialdom; Although Du Fu's life is poor and miserable, he cares about the world and expresses? Owning a mansion to shelter the poor in the world? Desire. Their lives are successful, and they let us know what is true. Is the Qing Dynasty self-purified? The heart is the world. Qu Yuan wore an E-crown and bluegrass, which made him feel sorry for the sufferings of people's livelihood. He wandered along the Miluo River, and when the country was in danger, he jumped to his ideal. Qu Yuan's life is also successful. He let us know what is the persistent pursuit of ideals.
There are many forms of success, but we should not measure success by the amount of money. Money, fame, people's pursuit and applause for success are so many accessories that sometimes they cover up the essence of success and make people blindly pursue brilliant shells. In fact, the most powerful weight to measure success is a full heart. A young man asked the old man, how can I succeed? The old man silently refused. He picked up a piece of paper from the ground, folded it into a boat and put it in the river in front of him. The ship sailed ahead unhurriedly. On the way, butterflies and flowers scratched on it, but it was unmoved and went all the way. The old man said that people will face many temptations in their lives. Only by staying unmoved and moving towards your dreams can you reach the other side of success. ?
The times need creators of material wealth, and the times cannot be separated from models in the spiritual field. The standard of success is not measured by wealth, but the strength of spirit is more admirable! We should always remember that money is only an accessory to success.
Standard for measuring success Composition 3: What is the standard for measuring success?
Everyone measures success by different standards. Some people regard sticking to the bottom line of value as success, others regard being rich as success, but there are always defects in the intermediate state, or are they rewarded with morality? Opportunity? , or do you want to discard it? Opportunity? Stick to morality.
The golden age of life growth is probably concentrated in the two periods of studying on campus and killing youth. Growth efficiency depends on mentality. Sponge psychology? When you are in the best position, you don't need other people's advice, and you know that you lack too much, and then you explore, there will be the following different phenomena:
First, people's spiritual growth, just like digestive organs, most people will die with the years.
The span of the golden period of growth varies from person to person, even if it is two golden periods, the absorption performance is different. In-depth discussion is the problem of the degree of shaping values. People with stereotyped values do not necessarily have a sense of purpose, but they must have a strong sense of direction, at least from the perspective of being a man, knowing what kind of person they want to be. In other periods except the golden age, the difference is also obvious. Most people will close their hearts early, and empiricism has gradually become the main means of thinking. There are two main reasons at work. First, the inertia of thinking is getting stronger and stronger, because the sense of purpose is becoming more and more vague, and the inner dreams or pursuits are basically given up; Second, the self-righteous heart is getting heavier and heavier. Most people often store their own success and others' failures in their brains to find a balance. Although the self-image may be consolidated or even taller, it will bring more harm, that is, this life is frozen.
Second, insight is related to objectivity, and social skills are related to subjectivity.
This phenomenon (or the viewpoint I have summarized) may be somewhat puzzling, so let's explain it with some viewpoints. First of all, it shows that insight refers to the ability to objectively analyze the essence or internal relevance of things, and social competence refers to the ability to solve specific social problems in society (including life communication and business environment, etc.). ), this is often a relationship problem. Secondly, there is an inevitable connection between the two, and insight provides people with a more comprehensive judgment ability, thus providing people with a basis for survival in social activities.
Finally, and most importantly, strictly speaking, there is no completely equal proportional relationship between the two. Especially, the higher the ability level, the two will not only be out of proportion, but will become a mutually restrictive relationship. Knowing this explains the above phenomenon.
Why? First of all, for example, in a business environment, we will see that thinking and business (relational) are in most cases? Separate? Yes Everyone will consciously or unconsciously refer to their own personality characteristics and knowledge reserve structure when choosing a career route at the beginning, but personality and knowledge reserve are two interactive systems, especially personality is basically a mapping of the environment. Therefore, people's career direction is essentially determined by personality (here is the general direction, similar to theoretical research based on this view). Well, this is the stage of choice.
Then there is the development stage. According to people's personality requirements, the general category of work is divided into introverted work and extroverted work. Here we need to limit it to the business environment, all of which are closely related to the business or strategic aspects. Introversion emphasizes strategy, thinking and strategic thinking; Extroversion emphasizes relationship, communication and relational thinking.
People with strategic thinking, systematic thinking is extremely important. To analyze any business phenomenon, we need to analyze it in a systematic framework. There are two reasons why we can't analyze some phenomena, or this phenomenon has gone beyond the boundary of the thinking system. For example, a person who has never been exposed to macroeconomics cannot deeply analyze the relationship between enterprises and industries and the macro environment. Either the thinking system is not good enough. The reason why it is not good enough can only be that it can't be built, and the reason why it can't be built is the lack of deconstruction ability. The essence of thinking deconstruction is to define and define the nature of an event. Nature is an attribute unit that cannot be subdivided by events. A thing or phenomenon has n attributes. Only by analyzing the essence can we deconstruct it, put it in a certain position in the brain from the deconstruction, and N positions are related at the same or different levels to form systematic thinking.
Therefore, objective analysis is the growth foundation of strategic thinking.
Then talk about relational thinking. There are two main forms of relationship function, one is systematic customer relationship management (CRM), and the other is to gain profits by establishing personal relationship, which is superior to normal business relationship and even destroys normal competitive relationship. In the normal business environment, relationship thinking and strategic thinking do not directly conflict, which is manifested in some strategic business market personnel who integrate relationship maintenance and strategic understanding. But for non-strategic business, sometimes the scoring standard of competition is vague. At this time, the correct way is to carry out administrative constraints through the government or industry organizations, and to constrain the standards that cannot be formed or are easily broken.
Unfortunately, however, the macro and micro markets in China were formed on the basis of China's history and culture. Among the cultural characteristics of China, the most influential business environment is the relationship-oriented social organization structure. The inaction of the government and the decline of industry organizations have aggravated the lack of many industry standards, further making the abnormal relationship-oriented resource allocation model prevail.
Okay, it's up there? Standard? This is a key word. If the standard is determined objectively, the above two abilities will not conflict, but if the standard is missing or distorted, the opposite result will be obtained. The enemy who engages in research is no match for those who engage in relationships, which is the proof of the current social phenomenon. This contradiction has been deeply rooted, which has seriously distorted China's business form and led to? 500 big? Is that impossible? Top 500? .
For the survival and development of individuals in the current commercial society, it is possible to face a dilemma, whether to remain sober and objective or to integrate with abnormal subjectivity. Only a few people can solve this difficult problem. I believe that Ma Yun and Wang Shi are the representatives, but they need extraordinary ability and constant efforts. More likely to be people without talent (so there is? Being pregnant is like being pregnant? The result is good enough), and people who give up halfway (the values are eroded and can even be called an absolute crowd).
There are two extremes to success, either to be Ma Yun or Lai Changxing. Both extremes are complete or close to complete, perhaps the least painful, and people in the middle are often the most painful. Looking at the measure of success, some people regard sticking to the bottom line of value as success, others regard being rich as success, but there are always defects in the intermediate state, or do they exchange morality? Opportunity? , or do you want to discard it? Opportunity? Stick to morality.