"Wrong application code or research field selection", ***708 items, accounting for18.53% of the total number of inadmissible projects;

The second reason is that "it does not belong to the category of project guiding funds", and there are ***608 projects, accounting for15.9438+0% of the total number of inadmissible projects;

The third reason is "failure to provide relevant certification materials as required", such as recommendation letter, tutor's consent, ethics Committee certificate, etc. ***583 items, accounting for15.26% of the total number of inadmissible items;

The fourth reason is "other admissible circumstances", with 535 items * *, of which the main reason is "filling in during the research period does not meet the requirements", with 5 items12, accounting for13.40%;

The fifth reason is "missing pages or missing items in the application (more than 50% were not filled in by the tutor)", with 430 items, accounting for 1 1.25% of the total rejected items.

According to statistical analysis, the main reason why the project application was rejected was that the applicant knew nothing about the management requirements in the annual project guide.

It is suggested that the applicant carefully read the corresponding contents of the project guide before filling in the application form, carefully fill in all the information in the application form, provide accurate information according to the writing outline and filling instructions, and pay attention to the accuracy and consistency of information such as research period, tutor situation, application code and signature; Relying on the scientific research management personnel of the unit should also carefully examine the application, paying special attention to the consistency of the unit name, official seal and other information.