My father is an educator, mainly responsible for popularizing compulsory education. When I was a child, he and his colleagues traveled all over the cities, counties and townships in my hometown province.
Their task is to set the objectives of the nine-year compulsory education, understand the needs, funding and acceptance of the local government, and persuade local people to send their children to school for education.
My father clearly stated the names and locations of all the primary and secondary schools in this province of my hometown, because they all came and went day and night.
I ran with him once when I was a child. At that time, the conditions were not good. I threw up in an old Volga car.
During all holidays, my father was on a business trip. In my childhood memory, he had little time to accompany me, but devoted himself to the leaders, principals, teachers and students in those schools and villages.
I still remember that one year during the Spring Festival, my father worked overtime for a holiday. On the last day, he finished reading the documents and just lay down. As a result, he received a phone call. The local leader said that two children were trampled to death when a school was doing class exercises before the holiday, because the stairs in the teaching building were narrow. The local authorities originally wanted to hide it, but the result was later revealed. As the person in charge of the higher-level supervision department, they died overnight.
At present, nine-year compulsory education is popularized in China, that is, children receive free education before junior high school, which is a national system. This is also the work that my father devoted all his life to. He told me that after the life of their generation is exhausted, successors will continue to work hard, and in the future, we will popularize high schools and universities. The richer a country is, the more it invests in education, so it should invest more in treating the next generation and in the field of education, so the quality of citizens is higher and the society is better.
My childhood was spent in the memory that my father didn't have time to educate me, but went to work for other people's children.
I have received public education since I was a child. However, I can be said to be miserable. I have been studying in key high schools, and I have no way to get into a good university in China.
In my memory of primary school, junior high school and senior high school, there are a few teachers in the first-class public schools in these countries who are responsible, but the better the school, the more teachers ring the bell in class and then start various classes to earn extra money.
what does this mean? Pot rice is delicious, but the country is big, there are many people, and the expenses are high. Everyone doesn't eat much. If you don't have enough to eat, you must find your own way. There are policies on the top and countermeasures on the bottom.
Later, I went abroad, not developed countries in Britain and America, but poorer countries. I found that foreign education is not the same. Also abroad, I read a doctor a little bit. After I graduated from undergraduate course, I went back to China and worked in a private university for a period of time. As far as my personal experience is concerned, I found that my salary is one third higher than that of a public university.
For this question, first of all, someone will definitely stand up and honestly say-
Private schools are a paradise for the rich. Only when the price is high can the rich study and the rich receive a better education. So this is anti-collective and anti-social. Our country should support the public sector, so that everyone can read books and all classes can afford education. Therefore, private education is the garbage of capitalism and anti-society, so it should be banned.
people who have this idea have no idea what is public and what is private.
it is not difficult to understand that public education means that the state pays money to build schools, pays teachers and subsidizes tuition fees for students, so that more people in society can afford education and popularize compulsory education. Public ownership is certainly good from the starting point, but in practice, the richer the country, the easier it is to operate, and the less affluent the country, the ideal is full, and it is inevitable that the reality is very skinny.
while private, it doesn't mean that private bosses pay for it to make money. There are great differences in the understanding of private between the east and the west.
international QS ranking in 218-
among them, the top five are MIT, Stanford, Harvard, California Institute of Technology, Cambridge and Oxford.
strictly speaking, they are all private.
some people may come forward and say, alas, Oxford and Cambridge are government-funded research schools and belong to the public.
yes, government expenditure does not mean that the government spends money to cover everything and the government decides everything.
Oxford University consists of 38 independent colleges and 4 academic colleges. Each academy is an independent administrative institution and belongs to the university. They have their own management framework, enrollment and student activities; The academic college is responsible for arranging teaching staff to give lectures and guide research projects, and for compiling courses and giving academic guidance. Universities receive commercial subsidies, and also have their own publishing houses for commercial activities.
The best universities in western countries are generally private, which can give universities more independent development space, market-oriented operation, better treatment for teachers, and naturally higher level of teaching and scientific research. However, the privatization of others does not mean that the boss is holding the shares and making money from this school. Most of them are sponsored by churches and foundations, and individuals donate money. Donation is public welfare, not profit.
In China, public education institutions let the state pay for education, and master's degree is not for profit. However, in fact, everyone can only get a limited share of porridge. The development of education is slow, and it is even weaker in cutting-edge fields. In China's social environment, some people even take advantage of public money, and all kinds of connections are complicated.
Private educational institutions in the West are more real social welfare organizations, because even if many rich people and consortia donate money to universities and scientific research institutions to avoid taxes, they donate money not to make money, but to change their names. This is good for their enterprise and good for society.
egalitarianism can't be achieved in many places, especially in China, where the population quality is relatively low, and the state makes great efforts to promote it, and a large number of lazy and poor people eat from the same pot, so it is difficult to make progress. Those who clamor for average are more unwilling to contribute and want to enjoy better welfare. The so-called citizen means that responsibilities and obligations should be equal, and you should pay as much as you want.
public and private enterprises should be encouraged to develop together, and state funds should be used to subsidize those universities that deserve subsidies. The cutting-edge fields should be used to the cutting edge. In the market-oriented operation, if the boss has money, he will pay for his own private operation. If he does well, he should make money. If the students have good conditions at home and want to receive a better education, he will go to the private interchange for a high price. For those big capitalists, instead of letting them invest their money in the entertainment circle, it is better to let them avoid taxes and donate education. No one should kidnap social morality. Economic law is the most objective law.
I sincerely hope that there will be several American Ivy League schools in China, so that more people in need of education can receive better education, and the quality of national citizens can really become better.
I work in Wenjiang, Chengdu. There are many private schools here, and there are few public schools in Wenjiang. However, there are many real estates, and the occupancy rate is extremely high, because Chengdu has a large population!
The nearest Guanghua Experimental Primary School, as far as I know, now there are 14 classes in Grade One, with 6 students in each class. The canteen of the school library is used as a classroom. Not to mention public kindergartens, Guanghua Kindergarten only recruits dozens of people, and there are no other public kindergartens nearby. If you want to get in, you have to sign up in the womb.
Are all the people who go to private schools rich? Not really, but I can't help it, there is no place to study!
If public schools can cater for all children, who wants to spend that money? There are more and more buildings in the city, but the infrastructure can't keep up, especially the educational facilities. Children really have nowhere to go to school.
For migrant workers like us, sometimes we are very grateful to these private schools. At least you can pay for them, but we don't have to look at public schools when local people can't guarantee them.
At least the current situation in Wenjiang cannot be cancelled, and it is getting better and better! Recently, on my way home from work, I saw two private kindergartens recruiting teachers. The decoration has been completed, and the estimated fee is more than 2, yuan.
this is the most unkind question I have ever seen. Private schools have been hated since their birth. Why?
The salary of private schools is generally 2-3 times that of public schools. Just like when I switched from a public middle school to a private middle school, my peers looked at me a little differently: I am also a teacher, just because I went to a private school, why is my salary so high?
Don't talk about peers, even the leaders of the education authorities are very dissatisfied. Especially when cars are not popular and teachers in private schools can buy cars first, teachers in private schools make some people uncomfortable, so the voice of criticizing private schools is getting louder and louder.
Because of its unique system, private schools have aroused the enthusiasm of teachers to the greatest extent, so their educational and teaching achievements are generally higher than those of public middle schools.
Public schools are faced with unprecedented challenges and feel great pressure, so they are full of envy and jealousy of private schools. In particular, the recent shrinking of students has made them feel a sense of crisis, so they are more eager to ban private secondary schools.
The emergence of private schools, like a catfish, stirred up the rigid education. Private schools should not be abolished, but should be strongly advocated and encouraged, because they have improved the quality of education and teaching as a whole and enabled ordinary people to enjoy high-quality educational resources at a lower price.
who is bad for private schools? In their view, the side of the couch can't allow others to sleep soundly. Private middle schools have moved their cheese, and they can't be as leisurely as they used to be!
I read several comments! Everyone is in favor of private schools, and everyone has mentioned what I want to say! I won't repeat it. I think private kindergartens are better than public kindergartens. The prominent problem is high fees, but don't spend them privately. You don't know how much black money to send! As Sun Yi went to public primary school, the teacher blatantly asked for a "tip". In the first semester of grade one, my son gave the teacher 1, yuan, which basically made do for one semester! In the second semester, because my son was busy and sent a "tip" a few days late, Wang Lin, the Chinese teacher in charge of the class, refused to let his grandson go to school. My son was helpless! I had to ask for leave to take my grandson to the dean, and the dean immediately arranged for his grandson to attend classes in the classroom, but Teacher Wang Lin launched the class cadres to besiege and provoke his grandson! My son had no choice but to go directly to the school principal. Teacher Wang Lin said that his grandson made trouble after class and fought with his classmates! My son asked for monitoring and verification! The school refused to monitor! But the headmaster assured my son that it would never happen again! You can work with peace of mind. Students who are dissatisfied with each gift because of the poor quality of Teacher Wang Lin! ) all bully students more or less, and one-third of parents have looked for the principal. The headmaster gave Wang Lin a warning! Therefore, I didn't send this 1 yuan to Wang Lin in the second semester, so I managed to finish the second semester of grade one!
Although Sun Zi is still studying in this public primary school in the second grade, Teacher Wang Lin has been transferred away! However, my son and daughter-in-law have been looking for a good private school and are ready to transfer their grandchildren to private schools. ........................
Private high schools must be cancelled! Private junior high schools and primary schools will be cancelled when conditions are ripe!
This time, the city-wide final exam of Grade One in Senior High School was jointly taken, and the private school "won" again! It is no surprise to win, because the teachers in the same profession have become accustomed to it, but what about public opinion?
This school is a private school with only about 1 students, which defeated the city's 57487. This is definitely the most famous "battle" in history, which is enough to go down in history.
every time there is a unified examination in the whole city, students and their parents will always get the test results ahead of the teachers, and they will also get the test results ranked in the whole city! Then it will spread wildly among various parents.
Then the question comes: Students' grades belong to students' privacy, and the Education Bureau has repeatedly asked teachers not to pass on students' grades in the group. How did this detailed report card of tens of thousands of people in the city come out? For what purpose did it come out? Who is the beneficiary?
In fact, the answer is clear at a glance, as long as you look at the top ten of this report card, you will know: a private "experimental" high school accounts for 7 people in the top 1 of the city.
Some people say that "this school is awesome"; Some people say that "teachers in this school use student accounts to do questions"; Some people say that "teachers in this school will reveal the answers in advance". We don't know exactly what it is.
However, as teachers, we should all understand that it is really normal for a school to occupy seven of the top ten students in the unified examination with nearly 6, students in the city. Even if the best teachers and students in the city are concentrated in two classes, can we really guarantee such a result? Besides, teachers and students are not the best! The question is, as long as it is the city's unified examination, this school will have such a brilliant "record", whether it is senior one, senior two or senior three. Why? Rational people should know it well.
this kind of publicity is very important for private schools, because what they need most is "advertising", and the results of the city's unified examination are the best "advertising words". Through this publicity, two purposes have been achieved:
First, put pressure on public schools! This goal has indeed been achieved, and the effect is very good! Just look at the panic performance of parents in public schools.
second, to "accumulate strength" for the impact of Peking University Tsinghua. If a private school is admitted to several Peking University Tsinghua every year, its future will be bright. However, does such a school really have this strength? Absolutely not! So is there a shortcut? Of course, that's "independent enrollment". What is the most important thing for independent enrollment in Peking University and Tsinghua? The fifth (fourth) major subject competition, this private school can't do it, and then spend money to think of other ways to "package". Apart from packaging, there is also a very important thing, which is the city's ranking in previous major exams. This is quite convincing. For universities, they don't know the process and only look at the results, so they will let such schools profit from it.
This is just the tip of the iceberg for "private schools" to run schools illegally! Illegal enrollment, buying students at high prices, making up lessons during holidays, and not offering enough courses according to regulations have all seriously disrupted the "educational ecology" of a region.
The same is true for primary schools and junior high schools!
One of our local real estate developers set up a "high-standard" international school in order to develop a house. At that time, he promised that as long as he bought a house, it would be a "school district room" and that he would attend a prestigious school free of charge at his doorstep. As a result, the developer forgot one thing, that is, people who bought a house were not only one child, but many people had two or more children, and the "degree" was seriously insufficient. Parents made a scene in the principal's office, and finally. How effective the education is, you can imagine!
whenever we talk about the disadvantages of "private schools", someone will always cite the United States as an example, saying that all the good schools in the United States are private schools! This is no problem, but don't forget, it's beauty.