Yes, the battle of Changjin Lake is on.

This is very interesting.

A director named Hao Ping posted on the Internet that the movie title of the Battle of Changjin Lake infringed the legitimate trademarks of others.

This is not the most ridiculous.

Director Hao Ping also said that if a lawsuit is filed, The Battle of Changjin Lake will be taken off the shelves.

A similar thing happened in Wolf Warriors 2, but that was before the film was released.

Producer and starring Jason Wu was asked to pay10 million yuan. As a result, the film was not postponed, and it broke the domestic box office record after its smooth release.

The battle of Changjin Lake was established on 20 19 and completed on 202 1 May.

This war blockbuster has been long-awaited by the industry. Are you sure the trademark is not registered maliciously?

Interestingly, Hao Ping also got the work registration certificate, saying that there was copyright infringement.

However, he only registered the outline of the story.

An outline adapted from real history said that others copied him. Do people who shoot the battle of Changjin Lake after that have to ask his permission?

This kind of touching porcelain has become an inescapable curse for domestic explosive movies.

Time is advancing.

"Hello Li Huanying", which exploded 5 billion during the Spring Festival, was said by the screenwriter to have copied his own works.

Wandering the Earth, winner of 20 19 Spring Festival Gala, is said to have copied the Japanese film Godzilla.

The summer explosions from 20 17 to 20 19 were all accused of plagiarism.

Dying is a fake because the plot is similar to the theme of the American film Dallas Buyers Club.

But in fact, the stories of the two films are far apart.

Moreover, "Survival is not allowed, death is not allowed" is adapted from real events, and plagiarism is indeed an additional crime with the permission of the parties.

The content of the film was ok, but it was copied by the poster.

After several posters with box office over 100 million were accused of being similar to Japanese comics, the official social platform of the film responded positively and apologized.

"The Richest Man in Xihong City" 20 18 won over 2.5 billion box office, ranking fourth in the annual box office.

The verdict of the first instance was that plagiarism was not established, but the prosecution still refused to accept the appeal.

In fact, The Richest Man in Xihong City is a remake, and the copyright has already been bought.

The screenwriter said that the plot of the remake movie is similar to his own, and the original movie must be the same. Does that mean he copied it first?

In the end, the second instance upheld the original judgment.

The judgment time is just before the start of the National Day file. I didn't expect it to be the turn to touch porcelain in the battle of Changjin Lake after a week.

Nezha was accused of plagiarism in the stage play "Five-dimensional Memory", which also caused a heated discussion.

The prosecution hyped up on social media and used Nezha's popularity to attract a lot of attention.

That's really not the case. Many people don't know that there is such a "non-legacy creative show".

However, this kind of hype is more just a stigma.

The results of the first trial were announced in May this year.

No accidents.

Plagiarism does not hold water.

This kind of touching porcelain is becoming more and more rampant because the cost may be far greater than the gain.

As long as you pay the lawyer's fee, even if the lawsuit is lost, you can get more benefits than the equivalent publicity fee, as long as the prosecution has enough cheek.

If filmmakers continue to tolerate this behavior, perhaps this absurd "curse" will last forever.

Sometimes it's best to take countermeasures and don't let the buffoon be too presumptuous.