?
The accumulated net value of the fund is an important indicator that investors pay attention to, and it is the value of the accumulated net value of the fund to a certain point in time. Because the investment strategy and market environment of fund managers are different, the accumulated net value of funds will be different, right?
We should make it clear that a high cumulative net value of a fund is not necessarily good, and a low cumulative net value of a fund is not necessarily bad. Different types of funds have different risk-return characteristics, so investors should choose appropriate funds according to their risk preferences and investment objectives.
The high cumulative net value of the fund may mean good investment performance of the fund, but it may also be caused by the large scale and long history of the fund. The low cumulative net value of the fund may also be caused by the small scale and the newly established fund, which does not necessarily mean the poor performance of the fund.
Investors should pay attention to the long-term performance of the fund, not just the accumulated net value of the fund. If the cumulative net value of a fund has been rising, but the performance in the past year or two is not good, then this fund may not be suitable for long-term investment.
When choosing a fund, investors should choose a fund that suits them according to their own risk preferences and investment objectives, and at the same time pay attention to the long-term performance and risk-return characteristics of the fund, rather than simply pursuing the accumulated net value of the fund.
A high cumulative net value of a fund is not necessarily good, and a low net value is not necessarily bad. Investors should choose suitable funds according to their own risk preferences and investment objectives, and pay attention to the long-term performance and risk-return characteristics of funds.