What you said is a bit general and difficult to say. I would like to say something to the inventor and the applicant.

If several of you are from the same company, and you all make inventions while performing tasks assigned by the company, then the company is the applicant and you are the inventors. If it is a company but has nothing to do with your work, you can also apply yourself as an applicant. If you are not from the same company, for example, if the invention was made during the assignment period or during the cooperation period, then your superior unit should be the applicant and you as the inventor. Theoretically, a person who only provides material financial conditions for an invention should not be regarded as an inventor. However, the qualifications of the inventor are not examined during patent examination, so the inventor only needs to discuss and confirm. After the invention is authorized, the company should reward you, and when the patent produces benefits, you should also enjoy a certain proportion of licensing fees or profits. This country's patent law has relevant regulations.