Current location - Trademark Inquiry Complete Network - Trademark registration - What do you think of RNG being awarded 3 million yuan for fighting fish?
What do you think of RNG being awarded 3 million yuan for fighting fish?

I think it is still the result of RNG's violation of the contract. This judgment is also reasonable. Since both parties have signed the contract, they must fulfill and abide by the contract during the contract period. If they violate it, the other party has the right to sue and claim compensation. Event review

After two years, the Wuhan Intermediate People's Court ruled that Betting Platform won the case in the appeal filed before Betting Fish, Leyou Company? That is to say, the operating main company of RNG needs to pay 3 million yuan in compensation to Betta, as well as the acceptance fee and preservation fee for this case.

The reason for the lawsuit is that during the period when Leyou Company signed a one-year contract with Betta Platform in September 218, its players? Posture? I went to Huya, a competitor of Betta, for live broadcast, and later learned that the operating company where RNG was located had handed over the operating rights of RNG team to other companies in January 219, including the brokerage rights of the players and the ownership and use rights of trademarks.

Moreover, two members of RNG team decided to retire two veterans without the permission of the fighting platform. This series of operations violated the terms of the contract signed by both parties.

In the judgment of the first instance, the court ruled that Betta won the case, which I think is also very reasonable. Now, whether we work or live, we must abide by the spirit of the contract. The cooperation between the two sides is based on mutual restraint and trust. If we go our own way, we will only be prosecuted in the end.

As we all know, Betta Fish and Huya are very competitive rivals. The anchor belonging to Betta Fish went to Huya Live without authorization, which is a violation of the contract, just like a boss paid the employee a year's salary and benefits in advance, but in the second half of the year, the employee went to a competitor's company to work for others. This situation will not be tolerated by anyone.

So I think this lawsuit and the final victory of Betta are reasonable and fair.